When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. John Austin (legal philosopher) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Austin_(legal...

    John Austin (3 March 1790 – 1 December 1859) was an English legal theorist who posthumously influenced British and American law with an analytical approach to jurisprudence and a theory of legal positivism. [1]

  3. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Province_of...

    According to Austin, a law is 'a rule laid down for the guidance of an intelligent being by an intelligent being having power over him.' This was what Austin defined as positive law. Austin believed that positive law was the appropriate focus of study for jurisprudence. He states that: 'Every positive law, or every law simply and strictly so ...

  4. Legal positivism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_positivism

    Theoretical legal positivism is a cluster of theories about the nature of law related to a "statalist" conception of law. [10] They include the theory that the law is a set of commands issued by the sovereign authority, whose binding force is guaranteed by the threat of sanctions (coercitive imperativism); a theory of legal sources, in which ...

  5. Hart–Fuller debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart–Fuller_debate

    Jurisprudence refers to analysis of the philosophy of law. Within jurisprudence there are multiple schools of thought, but the Hart–Fuller debate concerns just legal positivism and natural-law theory. [1] Legal positivists believe that "so long as [an] unjust law is a valid law, one has a legal obligation to obey it". [2]

  6. H. L. A. Hart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._L._A._Hart

    A critique of John Austin's theory that law is the command of the sovereign backed by the threat of punishment. A distinction between primary and secondary legal rules, such that a primary rule governs conduct, such as criminal law, and secondary rules govern the procedural methods by which primary rules are enforced, prosecuted and so on.

  7. Hart–Dworkin debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart–Dworkin_debate

    At the heart of the debate lies a Dworkinian critique of Hartian legal positivism, specifically, the theory presented in Hart's book The Concept of Law. While Hart insists that judges are within bounds to legislate on the basis of rules of law, Dworkin strives to show that in these cases, judges work from a set of "principles" which they use to ...

  8. Searle–Derrida debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Searle–Derrida_debate

    Studying J. L. Austin's theory of the illocutionary act in the perspective of deconstruction, Derrida argued in his 1972 paper "Signature Event Context" that Austin had missed the fact that any speech event is framed by a "structure of absence" (the words that are left unsaid due to contextual constraints) and by "iterability" (the repeatability of linguistic elements outside of their context).

  9. Jurisprudence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisprudence

    Jurisprudence, also known as theory of law or philosophy of law, is the examination in a general perspective of what law is and what it ought to be.It investigates issues such as the definition of law; legal validity; legal norms and values; as well as the relationship between law and other fields of study, including economics, ethics, history, sociology, and political philosophy.