When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Powell v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_v._Texas

    Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that a Texas statute criminalizing public intoxication did not violate the Eighth Amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment. The 5–4 decision's plurality opinion was by Justice Thurgood Marshall.

  3. Jackson v. Denno - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_v._Denno

    Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the process of determining whether a criminal defendant's confession was voluntary or coerced. The case was argued on December 9 and 10, 1963, and decided on June 22, 1964. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Byron White, the Court held that the rule ...

  4. Kansas v. Cheever - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_v._Cheever

    The Court also drew a distinction between "mental status," at issue in Buchanan, and "mental disease or defect," a provision of Kansas law which does not include voluntary intoxication, calling the former a broader term than the latter. Kansas' usage of the court-ordered exam to rebut the voluntary-intoxication defense is not prohibited by the ...

  5. Robinson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinson_v._California

    Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), is the first landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution was interpreted to prohibit criminalization of particular acts or conduct, as contrasted with prohibiting the use of a particular form of punishment for a crime.

  6. City of Grants Pass v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Grants_Pass_v._Johnson

    City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, 603 U.S. 520 (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that local government ordinances with civil and criminal penalties for camping on public land do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment of homeless people. [1]

  7. Birchfield v. North Dakota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birchfield_v._North_Dakota

    Birchfield was a consolidation of three cases: Birchfield v.North Dakota, Bernard v.Minnesota, and Beylund v.Levi.Birchfield was charged with violation of a North Dakota statute for refusing to submit to blood alcohol content testing; Bernard was charged with a violation of a Minnesota statute for refusing to submit to breath alcohol testing; Beylund underwent a blood alcohol test consistent ...

  8. Missouri v. McNeely - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._McNeely

    Breithaupt v. Abram (1957) U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that involuntary blood samples, taken by a skilled technician to determine intoxication, do not violate substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment; Birchfield v. North Dakota (2016) A warrantless breath test, on the other hand, is constitutional. Mitchell v.

  9. Tanner v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_v._United_States

    Tanner v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that juror testimony could not be used to discredit or overturn a jury verdict, even if the jury had been consuming copious amounts of alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine throughout the course of the trial.