Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Although Bertrand Russell at first argued against these remarks by Wittgenstein and Poincaré, claiming that mathematical truths were not only non-tautologous but were synthetic, he later spoke in favor of them in 1918: Everything that is a proposition of logic has got to be in some sense or the other like a tautology.
A graphical representation of a partially built propositional tableau. In proof theory, the semantic tableau [1] (/ t æ ˈ b l oʊ, ˈ t æ b l oʊ /; plural: tableaux), also called an analytic tableau, [2] truth tree, [1] or simply tree, [2] is a decision procedure for sentential and related logics, and a proof procedure for formulae of first-order logic. [1]
Law of noncontradiction; On Contradiction – 1937 essay by Mao Zedong; Oxymoron – Figure of speech; Paraconsistent logic – Type of formal logic without explosion principle; Paradox – Logically self-contradictory statement; Tautology – In logic, a statement which is always true; TRIZ – Problem-solving tools
In logic, the law of non-contradiction (LNC; also known as the law of contradiction, principle of non-contradiction (PNC), or the principle of contradiction) states that propositions cannot both be true and false at the same time, e. g. the two propositions "the house is white" and "the house is not white" are mutually exclusive.
[67] [69] An inconsistent formula is also called self-contradictory, [1] and said to be a self-contradiction, [1] or simply a contradiction, [82] [83] [84] although this latter name is sometimes reserved specifically for statements of the form (). [1]
Irving Anellis's research shows that C.S. Peirce appears to be the earliest logician (in 1883) to devise a truth table matrix. [4]From the summary of Anellis's paper: [4] In 1997, John Shosky discovered, on the verso of a page of the typed transcript of Bertrand Russell's 1912 lecture on "The Philosophy of Logical Atomism" truth table matrices.
Treating logical truths, analytic truths, and necessary truths as equivalent, logical truths can be contrasted with facts (which can also be called contingent claims or synthetic claims). Contingent truths are true in this world, but could have turned out otherwise (in other words, they are false in at least one possible world).
In classical logic, intuitionistic logic, and similar logical systems, the principle of explosion [a] [b] is the law according to which any statement can be proven from a contradiction. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] That is, from a contradiction, any proposition (including its negation ) can be inferred; this is known as deductive explosion .