Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
For rule utilitarians, the correctness of a rule is determined by the amount of good it brings about when followed. In contrast, act utilitarians judge an act in terms of the consequences of that act alone (such as stopping at a red light), rather than judging whether it faithfully adhered to the rule of which it was an instance (such as ...
Rosen (2003) warns that descriptions of utilitarianism can bear "little resemblance historically to utilitarians like Bentham and J. S. Mill" and can be more "a crude version of act utilitarianism conceived in the twentieth century as a straw man to be attacked and rejected." [25] It is a mistake to think that Bentham is not concerned with ...
That is, if people generally experience more happiness following action X than they do action Y, the utilitarian should conclude that action X produces more utility than action Y, and so is to be preferred. [81] Utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory, meaning that it holds that acts are justified insofar as they produce a desirable ...
He defended a version of rule utilitarianism in "Toward a credible form of utilitarianism" (1963) and performed cultural-anthropological studies in Hopi Ethics (1954). In A Theory of the Good and the Right , [ 10 ] Brandt proposed a "reforming definition" of rationality , that one is rational if one's preferences are such that they survive ...
Traditional utilitarianism (act utilitarianism) treats this as a claim that people should try to ensure that their actions maximizes the positive outcome for sentient beings. [3] [4] [5] Two-level utilitarianism is virtually a synthesis of the opposing doctrines of act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism states that in ...
I was hardly ever what you would call popular. People who attend Shakespeare camp rarely are. But in my teens and 20s, I always had a robust group of friends who shared my weirdness in differing ways.
makes people cold and unsympathetic (by focusing solely on the consequences of actions, rather than on features such as motives and character, which require a more sensitive and empathetic response) (p. 31) is a godless ethics (by failing to recognize that ethics is rooted in God's commands or will) (p. 33) confuses goodness with expediency (p.
Increasingly, women are playing the role of best friend, lover, career advisor, stylist, social secretary, emotional cheerleader, mom, and eventually, on-call therapist to their male partners.