When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism

    A syllogism takes the form (note: M – Middle, S – subject, P – predicate.): Major premise: All M are P. Minor premise: All S are M. Conclusion/Consequent: All S are P. The premises and conclusion of a syllogism can be any of four types, which are labeled by letters [14] as follows. The meaning of the letters is given by the table:

  3. Polysyllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polysyllogism

    A polysyllogism is a complex argument (also known as chain arguments of which there are four kinds: polysyllogisms, sorites, epicheirema, and dilemmas) [1] that strings together any number of propositions forming together a sequence of syllogisms such that the conclusion of each syllogism, together with the next proposition, is a premise for the next, and so on.

  4. Negative conclusion from affirmative premises - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_conclusion_from...

    Statements in syllogisms can be identified as the following forms: a: All A is B. (affirmative) e: No A is B. (negative) i: Some A is B. (affirmative) o: Some A is not B. (negative) The rule states that a syllogism in which both premises are of form a or i (affirmative) cannot reach a conclusion of form e or o (negative). Exactly one of the ...

  5. Epicheireme - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicheireme

    An epicheireme (/ ɛ p i ˈ k aɪ r i m / e-pee-KEYE-reem) [a] is a compound syllogism in which at least one of the premises is stated along with a justification for itself. [1] [2] Epicheirema are abridged polysyllogisms. [3] Like the enthymeme, epicheirema are often used in everyday speech. [citation needed]

  6. Fallacy of four terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_four_terms

    In everyday reasoning, the fallacy of four terms occurs most frequently by equivocation: using the same word or phrase but with a different meaning each time, creating a fourth term even though only three distinct words are used. The resulting argument sounds like the (valid) first example above, but is in fact structured like the invalid ...

  7. The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_False_Subtlety_of_the...

    An example of a syllogism of the third figure is: All mammals are air-breathers, All mammals are animals, Therefore, some animals are air-breathers. This validly follows only if an immediate inference is silently interpolated. The added inference is a conversion that uses the word "some" instead of "all." All mammals are air-breathers,

  8. Logic puzzle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_puzzle

    Another form of logic puzzle, popular among puzzle enthusiasts and available in magazines dedicated to the subject, is a format in which the set-up to a scenario is given, as well as the object (for example, determine who brought what dog to a dog show, and what breed each dog was), certain clues are given ("neither Misty nor Rex is the German Shepherd"), and then the reader fills out a matrix ...

  9. Indian logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_logic

    The development of Indian logic dates back to the Chandahsutra of Pingala and anviksiki of Medhatithi Gautama (c. 6th century BCE); the Sanskrit grammar rules of Pāṇini (c. 5th century BCE); the Vaisheshika school's analysis of atomism (c. 6th century BCE to 2nd century BCE); the analysis of inference by Gotama (c. 6th century BC to 2nd century CE), founder of the Nyaya school of Hindu ...