Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The concept of reasonableness has two related meanings in law and political theory: As a legal norm , it is used "for the assessment of such matters as actions, decisions, and persons, rules and institutions, [and] also arguments and judgments."
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard should apply to a civilian's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other "seizure" of his or her person.
In law, subjective standard and objective standards are legal standards for knowledge or beliefs of a plaintiff or defendant. [1] [2]: 554–559 [3]An objective standard of reasonableness ascertains the knowledge of a person by viewing a situation from the standpoint of a hypothetical reasonable person, without considering the particular physical and psychological characteristics of the defendant.
In law, a reasonable person, reasonable man, sometimes referred to situationally, [1] is a hypothetical person whose character and care conduct, under any common set of facts, is decided through reasoning of good practice or policy. [2] [3] It is a legal fiction [4] crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions. [5]
The correctness standard will apply with respect of jurisdictional and some other questions of law, and the reasonableness standard is concerned mostly with the existence of justification, transparency, and intelligibility within the decision‑making process and with whether the decision falls within a range of possible acceptable outcomes ...
Yet because the reasonableness standard was in truth an abuse-of-discretion standard, he felt bound to defer to the assessment of the trial court. Justice Scalia theorized that reasonableness review can be only procedural and not substantive. This conclusion flows from the Sixth Amendment requirement that any fact legally necessary to support a ...
Accountability for reasonableness is an ethical framework that describes the conditions of a fair decision-making process. It focuses on how decisions should be made and why these decisions are ethical.
Reasonable doubt, a legal standard of proof in most adversarial criminal systems; Reasonable person, a person who exercises care, skill, and appropriate judgment Reasonableness, the quality of a government action that is reasonable; Subjective and objective standard of reasonableness, legal standards of reasonableness