Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Biosocial criminology is an interdisciplinary field that aims to explain crime and antisocial behavior by exploring biocultural factors. While contemporary criminology has been dominated by sociological theories, biosocial criminology also recognizes the potential contributions of fields such as behavioral genetics, neuropsychology, and evolutionary psychology.
Matthew Barnett Robinson is a Criminologist at Appalachian State University (ASU) in Boone, North Carolina.. After receiving his PhD from the Florida State University School of Criminology & Criminal Justice, he accepted a position as assistant professor in the Department of Political Science and Criminal Justice at ASU in 1997, and is now a full professor.
Biogeography is the study of the distribution of species and ecosystems in geographic space and through geological time.Organisms and biological communities often vary in a regular fashion along geographic gradients of latitude, elevation, isolation and habitat area. [1]
Although much research has been discovered in relation to neurocriminology, all atypical brain functions do not objectively result in deviant, criminal, or problematic behaviors. This bias can potentially bring bias towards those with divergent mental functionings into being categorized as those who are unable to make–morally–correct decisions.
Environmental criminology is the study of crime, criminality, and victimization as they relate, first, to particular places, and secondly, to the way that individuals and organizations shape their activities spatially, and in so doing are in turn influenced by place-based or spatial factors.
The correlates of crime explore the associations of specific non-criminal factors with specific crimes. The field of criminology studies the dynamics of crime. Most of these studies use correlational data; that is, they attempt to identify various factors are associated with specific categories of criminal behavior. Such correlational studies ...
Gillian Balfour and Elizabeth Comack critique the limited amount of research done on criminalized women and the ways in which the research conceptualizes women as 'other' than men. [18] Theorists argue that because of this gap, explanatory models that have been developed to explain crime have low generalizability.
In general terms, positivism rejected the Classical Theory's reliance on free will and sought to identify positive causes that determined the propensity for criminal behaviour. The Classical School of Criminology believed that the punishment against a crime, should in fact fit the crime and not be immoderate.