Ads
related to: parallels between daniel and revelation 12 commentary charles stanley bible study
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The historicist views of Revelation 12–13 see the first beast of Revelation 13 (from the sea) to be considered to be the pagan Rome and the Papacy, or more exclusively the latter. [ 68 ] In 1798, the French General Louis Alexandre Berthier exiled the Pope and took away all his authority, which was restored in 1813, destroyed again in 1870 ...
The most notable commentaries from this period are those of Bousset (1896⁵, 1906⁶), Charles (1920), Lohmeyer (1926), and Allo (1933). Following the contributions of Bousset, Charles, and Lohmeyer, many exegetes believed that little remained to be done, and only sporadically engaged with the exegesis of this book. [49]
The unprecedented upheaval of the French Revolution in the 1790s was one of several factors that turned the eyes of Bible students around the world to the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation. Coming to the Bible with a historicist scheme of interpretation, Bible scholars began to study the time prophecies.
There are two kinds of prophecy in the Bible. One is Classical (or typical) prophecy which commonly deals with immediate events or issues. An example of this is Belshazzar's feast. Daniel 5 tells how Belshazzar holds a great feast and a hand appears and prophetically writes on the wall that his kingdom will be given to the Medes and the Persians.
Desmond Ford, Crisis: A Commentary on the Book of Revelation Volumes 1–3, 1982. Daniel commentaries: Daniel, 1978; Daniel and The Coming King, 1996; In the Heart of Daniel: An Exposition of Daniel 9:24–27, 2007; and others; Le Roy Froom, The Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers DjVu (4 volumes), the classic in-depth study
The futurist view assigns all or most of the prophecy to the future, shortly before the Second Coming; especially when interpreted in conjunction with Daniel, Isaiah 2:11–22, 1 Thessalonians 4:15–5:11, and other eschatological sections of the Bible. [citation needed] 1919 chart by Clarence Larkin attempting to explain the events of Revelation.
In the context of Christian eschatology, idealism (also called the spiritual approach, the allegorical approach, the nonliteral approach, and many other names) involves an interpretation of the Book of Revelation that sees all or most of the imagery of the book as symbolic.
The Navarre Bible (2004), commentary to the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition text by the faculty of the University of Navarra. Sacra Pagina (2008), edited by Daniel J. Harrington, SJ. New Collegeville Bible Commentary (2015), edited by Daniel Durken, OSB. Ignatius Catholic Study Bible Series (2017), edited by Scott Hahn and Curtis Mitch.