Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Fritz Heider discovered Attribution theory during a time when psychologists were furthering research on personality, social psychology, and human motivation. [5] Heider worked alone in his research, but stated that he wished for Attribution theory not to be attributed to him because many different ideas and people were involved in the process. [5]
In general, an attribute–value system may contain any kind of data, numeric or otherwise. An attribute–value system is distinguished from a simple "feature list" representation in that each feature in an attribute–value system may possess a range of values (e.g., feature P 1 below, which has domain of {0,1,2}), rather than simply being ...
For example, involuntary events like digestion and earthquakes can have a positive or negative value even if they are not right or wrong in a strict sense. [20] Despite the distinction, evaluative and normative concepts are closely related. For example, the value of the consequences of an action may affect whether this action is right or wrong ...
Psychology portal; Theory of mind – Ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others; Attribution (psychology) – Process by which individuals explain causes of behavior and events; Fallacy of the single cause – Assumption of a single cause where multiple factors may be necessary; Causality – How one process influences another
Occurs when a judgment has to be made (of a target attribute) that is computationally complex, and instead a more easily calculated heuristic attribute is substituted. This substitution is thought of as taking place in the automatic intuitive judgment system, rather than the more self-aware reflective system. Curse of knowledge
In the example to the right, the examinee mastered attributes A1 and A4 to A6. Three performance levels were selected for reporting attribute mastery: non-mastery (attribute probability value between 0.00 and 0.35), partial mastery (attribute probability value between 0.36 and 0.70), and mastery (attribute probability value between 0.71 and 1.00).
The attribution-value model is a framework for understanding individual differences in prejudice, developed by Chris Crandall and colleagues. [1] It states that not only do minorities possess undesirable characteristics incongruent with the majority, but also that minorities are also responsible for them.
Means-end chain analyses often find that consumers select products with attributes that deliver consequences, which in turn contribute to value fulfillment. In short, people's values resonate in and are observable throughout their daily lives. [7] An example, presented in the Journal of Advertising Research by Eda Gurel-Atay, is coffee. People ...