Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Different approximate matchers impose different constraints. Some matchers use a single global unweighted cost, that is, the total number of primitive operations necessary to convert the match to the pattern. For example, if the pattern is coil, foil differs by one substitution, coils by one insertion, oil by one deletion, and foal by two ...
one piece (the tag) contains the value of the remaining bits of the address; if these bits match with those from the memory address to read or write, then the other piece contains the cached value for this address. the other piece maintains the data associated to that address.
Several progressively more accurate approximations of the step function. An asymmetrical Gaussian function fit to a noisy curve using regression.. In general, a function approximation problem asks us to select a function among a well-defined class [citation needed] [clarification needed] that closely matches ("approximates") a target function [citation needed] in a task-specific way.
The second is based on quantile regression using values of the process which are close to the value one is trying to predict, where distance is measured in terms of a metric on the set of indices. Local Approximate Gaussian Process uses a similar logic but constructs a valid stochastic process based on these neighboring values.
The TM, in effect, "proposes" the match to the translator; it is then up to the translator to accept this proposal or to edit this proposal to more fully equate with the new source text that is undergoing translation. In this way, fuzzy matching can speed up the translation process and lead to increased productivity.
Then if P is shifted to k 2 such that its left end is between c and k 1, in the next comparison phase a prefix of P must match the substring T[(k 2 - n)..k 1]. Thus if the comparisons get down to position k 1 of T, an occurrence of P can be recorded without explicitly comparing past k 1. In addition to increasing the efficiency of Boyer–Moore ...
Maximum cardinality matching is a fundamental problem in graph theory. [1] We are given a graph G, and the goal is to find a matching containing as many edges as possible; that is, a maximum cardinality subset of the edges such that each vertex is adjacent to at most one edge of the subset.
The full potential of parameterized approximation algorithms is utilized when a given optimization problem is shown to admit an α-approximation algorithm running in () time, while in contrast the problem neither has a polynomial-time α-approximation algorithm (under some complexity assumption, e.g., ), nor an FPT algorithm for the given parameter k (i.e., it is at least W[1]-hard).