When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Plea colloquy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea_colloquy

    Plea colloquy. A plea colloquy, in United States criminal procedure, is a conversation between a judge and a criminal defendant who has been sworn under oath, which must occur when the defendant enters a guilty plea in court in order for the plea to be valid. [1] The United States Supreme Court has crafted a doctrine which requires the court to ...

  3. Colloquy (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colloquy_(law)

    In law, a colloquy is a routine, highly formalized conversation. [1] Conversations among the judge and lawyers (as opposed to testimony under oath) are colloquies.The term may be applied to the conversation that takes place when a defendant enters into a plea bargain and the judge is supposed to verify that the defendant understands that he is waiving his right to a jury trial.

  4. Missouri v. Frye - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._Frye

    In August 2007, Galin Frye was arrested and charged with driving without a license for the third time, making it a felony in Missouri.The prosecutor in the case sent Frye's attorney two plea offers; one to recommend a three-year sentence with Frye serving only ten days in jail if he pleaded guilty to the felony, and the second to reduce the felony to a misdemeanor, and Frye to serve 90 days in ...

  5. Heck v. Humphrey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heck_v._Humphrey

    Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court held that "in order to recover damages for allegedly unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment, or for other harm caused by actions whose unlawfulness would render a conviction or sentence invalid, a §1983 plaintiff must prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal ...

  6. Iowa v. Tovar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa_v._Tovar

    VI. Iowa v. Tovar, 541 U.S. 77 (2004), [1] was a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that clarified how well-informed a defendant had to be to waive their right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. [2] The defendant in this case had waived his right to counsel and pled guilty to drunk driving, and then had been ...

  7. Strickland v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strickland_v._Washington

    Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. The decision was a compromise by the majority in which the varying "tests for ineffective performance of ...

  8. Fact bargaining - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact_bargaining

    Fact bargaining. Fact bargaining is a type of plea bargaining that occurs when prosecutors and defendants bargain over what version of events should be stipulated to by the parties and presented to the court as what happened. Some statutes or sentencing guidelines specify that certain increases or decreases in the sentencing range must occur if ...

  9. Plea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plea

    Look up plea, plead, pleaded, pled, guilty, or not guilty in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. In law, a plea is a defendant 's response to a criminal charge. [1] A defendant may plead guilty or not guilty. Depending on jurisdiction, additional pleas may be available, including nolo contendere (no contest), no case to answer (in the United ...