Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Alberta (fl. 1071) was the queen consort of King Sancho II of Castile (1065–1072).. She is known only from two documents. The earlier, dated 26 March 1071, is a charter issued by Sancho to the monastery of San Pedro de Cardeña. [1]
On 10/17 November 1128 in Saldaña, Berengaria married Alfonso VII, King of Castile, León and Galicia. [1] Their children were: Sancho III of Castile (1134–1158) Ramon, living 1136, died in infancy; Ferdinand II of León (1137–1188) Constance (c. 1138–1160), married Louis VII of France; Sancha (c. 1139–1179), married Sancho VI of Navarre
1065 MLXV: Korean calendar: 3398: Minguo calendar: 847 before ROC 民前847年: Nanakshahi calendar: −403: Seleucid era: 1376/1377 AG: Thai solar calendar: 1607–1608: Tibetan calendar: 阳木龙年 (male Wood-Dragon) 1191 or 810 or 38 — to — 阴木蛇年 (female Wood-Snake) 1192 or 811 or 39
Sancho (Sancius filius, Sancho the son) with his father, King Ramiro (Ranimirus rex)From a thirteenth-century manuscript of Jaca. Sancho Ramírez (c. 1042 – 4 June 1094) was King of Aragon from 1063 until 1094 and King of Pamplona from 1076 under the name of Sancho V (Basque: Antso V.a Ramirez).
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The Kingdom of León-Castilla under King Alfonso VI, 1065–1109. Princeton University Press. Reilly, Bernard F. (1995). The Contest of Christian and Muslim Spain, 1031–1157. Blackwell. Salazar y Acha, Jaime de (1992–1993). "Contribución al estudio del reinado de Alfonso VI de Castilla: algunas aclaraciones sobre su política matrimonial".
Late filing of returns of partnership income (Form 1065) can result in penalties of $195 per month per partner, up to a maximum of 12 months. [14] Similar penalties may apply to an income tax return (Form 1120S) for an S corporation. [15] [16]
Title 10, Section 341 of the Delaware Code states that the Court "shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters and causes in equity." [8] Subsequent decisions have held that the Court's equitable jurisdiction is the same as that held by the English High Court of Chancery at the time of American independence in 1776. [citation needed]