Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Internet Watch Foundation: 5 December 2008: 9 December 2008 (Unblocked by IWF) Wayback Machine: archive.org Web archive: Site incompatibility with Cleanfeed: Internet Watch Foundation [26] 14 January 2009: 16 January 2009 [27] FileServe: fileserve.com File hosting: Mistake Internet Watch Foundation [28] 16 November 2011 [29] 18 November 2011 ...
Blacklist entries as of June 2017 by agencies responsible for the entry In 2004 Russia pressured Lithuania, and in 2006 Sweden, into shutting down the Kavkaz Center website, a site that supports creation of a Sharia state in North Caucasus and hosts videos of terrorist attacks on Russian forces in the North Caucasus.
This system is only for the purpose of reviewing blocks. Requests to edit articles on your behalf will be disregarded. Correspondence containing legal threats, personal attacks or rudeness are likely to be ignored and may result in the lengthening of pre-existing blocks and/or temporary ban from using this system.
Internet censorship circumvention is the use of various methods and tools to bypass internet censorship.. There are many different techniques to bypass such censorship, each with unique challenges regarding ease of use, speed, and security risks.
Internet censorship is the legal control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. Censorship is most often applied to specific internet domains (such as Wikipedia.org, for example) but exceptionally may extend to all Internet resources located outside the jurisdiction of the censoring state.
"Shadow banning" became popularized in 2018 as a conspiracy theory when Twitter shadow-banned some Republicans. [22] In late July 2018, Vice News found that several supporters of the US Republican Party no longer appeared in the auto-populated drop-down search menu on Twitter, thus limiting their visibility when being searched for; Vice News alleged that this was a case of shadow-banning.
Livestreamed crime is a phenomenon in which criminal acts are publicly livestreamed on social media platforms such as Twitch or Facebook Live.. Due to the fact that livestreams are accessible instantaneously, it is difficult to quickly detect and moderate violent content, and almost impossible to protect the privacy of victims or bystanders.
This approach to web blocking has been criticised for being extra-parliamentary and extrajudicial [157] and for being a proactive process where authorities actively seek out material to ban. [14] Additionally, concerns have been expressed by ISPs and freedom of speech advocates that these measures could lead to the censorship of content that is ...