When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Disparate impact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

    The disparate impact theory has application also in the housing context under Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, also known as the Fair Housing Act. The ten federal appellate courts that have addressed the issue have all determined that one may establish a Fair Housing Act violation through the disparate impact theory of liability.

  3. Ricci v. DeStefano - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci_v._DeStefano

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. DeStefano , 557 U.S. 557 (2009), is a United States labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on unlawful discrimination through disparate impact under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 .

  4. Washington v. Davis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_v._Davis

    The Court held that the Court of Appeals had erroneously assumed that the stricter, effects-based "disparate impact" test, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, existed under the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause as well. The Court pointed out that the Washington, D.C., police department had gone to significant lengths to ...

  5. Looking forward and back as the Civil Rights Act turns 60 - AOL

    www.aol.com/looking-forward-back-civil-rights...

    President Lyndon B. Johnson hands a pen to Rev. Martin Luther King after signing the historic Civil Rights Act in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C. on July 2, 1964.

  6. Alexander v. Sandoval - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_v._Sandoval

    Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001), was a Supreme Court of the United States decision that a regulation enacted under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [1] did not include a private right of action to allow private lawsuits based on evidence of disparate impact. [2]

  7. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co.

    Davis test for disparate impact is used in constitutional equal protection clause cases, while Title VII's prohibition on disparate impact is a statutory mandate.) As such, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits employment tests (when used as a decisive factor in employment decisions) that are not a "reasonable measure of job performance ...

  8. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wards_Cove_Packing_Co._v...

    A group of nonwhite cannery workers including Frank Atonio filed suit in District Court citing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 complaining that the Wards Cove Packing Company, a company that operated several Alaskan salmon canneries, was using discriminatory hiring practices that resulted in a large number of the skilled permanent jobs that mostly did not involve working in a cannery ...

  9. Black History/White Lies: The 10 biggest myths about the ...

    www.aol.com/news/black-history-white-lies-10...

    Before the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, most white Americans had unfavorable opinions of the Freedom Riders, sit-ins and the March on Washington. A year after the Civil Rights Act passed ...