When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Contraposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition

    In mathematics, proof by contrapositive, or proof by contraposition, is a rule of inference used in proofs, where one infers a conditional statement from its contrapositive. [15] In other words, the conclusion "if A , then B " is inferred by constructing a proof of the claim "if not B , then not A " instead.

  3. Mathematical proof - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

    Proof by contraposition infers the statement "if p then q" by establishing the logically equivalent contrapositive statement: "if not q then not p". For example, contraposition can be used to establish that, given an integer , if is even, then is even: Suppose is not even.

  4. Contradiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

    A system will be said to be inconsistent if it yields the assertion of the unmodified variable p [S in the Newman and Nagel examples]. In other words, the notion of "contradiction" can be dispensed when constructing a proof of consistency; what replaces it is the notion of "mutually exclusive and exhaustive" classes.

  5. Proof by contradiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_contradiction

    [3] A mathematical proof employing proof by contradiction usually proceeds as follows: The proposition to be proved is P. We assume P to be false, i.e., we assume ¬P. It is then shown that ¬P implies falsehood. This is typically accomplished by deriving two mutually contradictory assertions, Q and ¬Q, and appealing to the law of ...

  6. Logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

    Each proposition has three essential parts: a subject, a predicate, and a copula connecting the subject to the predicate. [107] For example, the proposition "Socrates is wise" is made up of the subject "Socrates", the predicate "wise", and the copula "is". [108] The subject and the predicate are the terms of the proposition. Aristotelian logic ...

  7. Affirming the consequent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent

    This is the contrapositive of the first statement, and it must be true if and only if the original statement is true. Example 2. If an animal is a dog, then it has four legs. My cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.

  8. Glossary of logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_logic

    A three-valued logic where the third truth value is the truth-value gap "neither true nor false" ("N"), and the designated values are "true" and "neither true nor false." [10] analysis 1. Analysis, the process of breaking a concept down into more simple parts, so that its logical structure is displayed. 2. Mathematical analysis analytic

  9. Modus tollens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_tollens

    The form of a modus tollens argument is a mixed hypothetical syllogism, with two premises and a conclusion: . If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P.. The first premise is a conditional ("if-then") claim, such as P implies Q.