Ad
related to: is 1893 latest revision cases
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Statute Law Revision (No. 2) Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 54) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. This Act was repealed for the United Kingdom by Group 1 of Part IX of Schedule 1 to the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1998 .
The Statute Law Revision (No. 1) Bill [6] had its first reading in the House of Lords on 6 February 1893, presented by the Lord Chancellor, Farrer Herschell, 1st Baron Herschell. [ 7 ] [ 8 ] The bill had its second reading in the House of Lords on 27 February 1893, introduced by the Lord Chancellor , [ 7 ] [ 8 ] and committed to a joint committee .
Judiciary Act of 1891 bars Court from considering entire case without questions that can be separately resolved; cert denied and question of resolving two earlier cases reverts to Seventh Circuit Talton v. Mayes: 163 U.S. 376 (1896) individual rights in U.S. Constitution not applicable to tribal governments Ward v. Race Horse: 163 U.S. 504 ...
The Civil Rights Cases, 3 (1883), were a group of five cases in which the Supreme Court held that the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments did not empower Congress to outlaw racial discrimination by private individuals. The holding regarding the 13th Amendment was overturned by the Court in the 1968 case Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
This is a complete list of acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom for the year 1893. Note that the first parliament of the United Kingdom was held in 1801; parliaments between 1707 and 1800 were either parliaments of Great Britain or of Ireland ).
The Statute Law Revision Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 14) The Statute Law Revision (No. 2) Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c 54) The Statute Law Revision Act 1894 (57 & 58 Vict. c. 56) The Statute Law Revision Act 1898 (61 & 62 Vict. c. 22) The Statute Law Revision Act 1908 (8 Edw. 7. c. 49) The Statute Law Revision Act 1927 (17 & 18 Geo. 5. c. 42)
Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893), decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 15, 1893, was a case challenging provisions in Section 6 of the Geary Act of 1892 that extended and amended the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The provisions in question required Chinese in the United States to obtain certificates of residency ...
Tennessee (1893), [8] a case turning on whether an incorrectly drawn boundary between two states can be changed by a state court, and whether the setting of the correct boundary requires Congressional approval. Two other original jurisdiction cases involve colonial-era borders and rights under navigable waters in New Jersey v.