Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Correspondence analysis (CA) is a multivariate statistical technique proposed [1] by Herman Otto Hartley (Hirschfeld) [2] and later developed by Jean-Paul Benzécri. [3] It is conceptually similar to principal component analysis , but applies to categorical rather than continuous data.
In statistics, multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a data analysis technique for nominal categorical data, used to detect and represent underlying structures in a data set. It does this by representing data as points in a low-dimensional Euclidean space .
Classic correspondence analysis is a statistical method that gives a score to every value of two nominal variables. In this way the Pearson correlation coefficient between them is maximized. There exists an equivalent of this method, called grade correspondence analysis, which maximizes Spearman's ρ or Kendall's τ. [17]
Correspondent inference theory is a psychological theory proposed by Edward E. Jones and Keith E. Davis (1965) that "systematically accounts for a perceiver's inferences about what an actor was trying to achieve by a particular action". [1] The purpose of this theory is to explain why people make internal or external attributions.
Multiple factor analysis (MFA) is a factorial method [1] devoted to the study of tables in which a group of individuals is described by a set of variables (quantitative and / or qualitative) structured in groups.
Correspondence inferences were invited to a greater degree by interpretative action verbs (such as "to help") than state action or state verbs, thus suggesting that the two are produced under different circumstances. Correspondence inferences and causal attributions also differ in automaticity.
In psychology literature, it is often referred to as paired comparison. Prominent psychometrician L. L. Thurstone first introduced a scientific approach to using pairwise comparisons for measurement in 1927, which he referred to as the law of comparative judgment.
The correspondence hypothesis suggests individual differences in religious beliefs and experience should correspond with individual differences in the internal working models and attachment patterns. [1] This theory suggests a "secure" IWM of self and others predicts viewing God as supporting.