Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The ongoing research of the Stanford Web Credibility Project includes: Performing quantitative research on Web credibility; Collecting all public information on Web credibility; Acting as a clearinghouse for this information; Facilitating research and discussion about Web credibility; Collaborating with academic and industry research groups
Examples of universities that use the CRAAP test include Central Michigan University, [6] Benedictine University, [7] Community College of Baltimore County, [8] among the many examples. There are other schools that use the test as a way for students to do well on their assignments in subjects that require research papers.
Some questionable sources might include legitimate articles to hide their true intentions. Evaluating publications requires extensive research and knowledge. Generally, it’s beneficial to rely on professionals to assess credibility, especially for scientific claims or local newspapers, which vary significantly in quality and reputation.
These media do not have adequate levels of editorial oversight or author credibility and lack assured persistence. An Internet forum with identifiable, expert and credible moderators with a declared corrective moderation policy may, exceptionally, be considered reliable for some topics. In this sense, where moderators act as editors to review ...
Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...
Articles of high reliability will often contain both online sources (freely accessible via the Web) and offline sources (books or scholarly articles). The presence of online sources makes it easier for users to verify factual accuracy, whereas the presence of offline sources may be an indicator of thorough research.
For example, a paper reviewing existing research, a review article, monograph, or textbook is often better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised. Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves ( see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point ...
Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article.