When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Correspondence theory of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correspondence_theory_of_truth

    Correspondence theory is a traditional model which goes back at least to some of the ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. [2] [3] This class of theories holds that the truth or the falsity of a representation is determined solely by how it relates to a reality; that is, by whether it accurately describes that reality.

  3. Category:Theories of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Theories_of_truth

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  4. Coherentism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherentism

    The coherentist theory of justification, which may be interpreted as relating to either theory of coherent truth, characterizes epistemic justification as a property of a belief only if that belief is a member of a coherent set. What distinguishes coherentism from other theories of justification is that the set is the primary bearer of ...

  5. Truthmaker theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthmaker_theory

    The correspondence theory of truth states that truth consists in correspondence with reality. [7] Or in the words of Thomas Aquinas: "A judgment is said to be true when it conforms to the external reality". [14] Truthmaker theory is closely related to correspondence theory; some authors see it as a modern version of correspondence theory. [15]

  6. Baruch Spinoza - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch_Spinoza

    Spinoza engaged in correspondence with Willem van Blijenbergh, an amateur Calvinist theologian, who sought Spinoza's view on the nature of evil and sin. Whereas Blijenbergh deferred to the authority of scripture for theology and philosophy, Spinoza told him not solely to look at scripture for truth or anthropomorphize God.

  7. Talk:Correspondence theory of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Correspondence_theory...

    Perhaps explain the Theory by describing one it therefore is NOT. As described, I struggle to understand how the Correspondence Theory is not possible. Also, explanations of alternatives to the Correspondence Theory would be helpful - as is done in the Stanford Encyclopedia entry. IntangibleTruth 06:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

  8. Slingshot argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slingshot_argument

    If one is not willing to accept Russell's theory, then it seems wise to challenge either substitution or redistribution, which seem to be the other weakest points in the argument. Perry (1996), for example, rejects both of these principles, proposing to replace them with certain weaker, qualified versions that do not allow the slingshot ...

  9. Correspondence (theology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correspondence_(theology)

    The doctrine of analogy and correspondence, present in all esoteric schools of thinking, upholds that the Whole is One and that its different levels (realms, worlds) are equivalent systems, whose parts are in strict correspondence. So much so that a part in a realm symbolically reflects and interacts with the corresponding part in another realm.