When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cognitive dissonance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

    In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is described as the mental phenomenon of people existing with unwittingly and fundamentally conflicting cognition. [1] Being confronted by situations that challenge this dissonance may ultimately result in some change in their cognitions or actions to cause greater alignment between them so as to reduce this dissonance. [2]

  3. Self-justification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-justification

    Dissonance can result from an action dissonant with either a negative or positive concept. For example, Aronson [3] showed that students who failed numerous times at a task showed evidence of dissonance when they later succeeded at the same task. Some even changed correct answers to present a consistent image.

  4. List of cognitive biases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases

    Cognitive dissonance is the perception of contradictory information and the mental toll of it. Normalcy bias, a form of cognitive dissonance, is the refusal to plan for, or react to, a disaster which has never happened before.

  5. Choice-supportive bias - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice-supportive_bias

    The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance. Choice-supportive bias is potentially related to the aspect of cognitive dissonance explored by Jack Brehm (1956) as postdecisional dissonance. Within the context of cognitive dissonance, choice-supportive bias would be seen as reducing the ...

  6. Effort justification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effort_justification

    Effort justification is an idea and paradigm in social psychology stemming from Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance. [1] Effort justification is a person's tendency to attribute the value of an outcome they put effort into achieving as greater than the objective value of the outcome.

  7. Ambivalent prejudice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambivalent_prejudice

    Ambivalent prejudice is a social psychological theory that states that, when people become aware that they have conflicting beliefs about an outgroup (a group of people that do not belong to an individual's own group), they experience an unpleasant mental feeling generally referred to as cognitive dissonance.

  8. Insufficient justification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insufficient_justification

    The theory of insufficient justification formally states that when extrinsic motivation is low, people are motivated to reduce cognitive dissonance by generating an intrinsic motivation to explain their behavior, and similarly more likely to decline a desired activity when presented with a mild threat versus a more serious threat. Insufficient ...

  9. Cognitive bias - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias

    Cognitive dissonance, and related: Impression management; Self-perception theory; Information-processing shortcuts , [61] including: Availability heuristic — estimating what is more likely by what is more available in memory, which is biased toward vivid, unusual, or emotionally charged examples [6]