Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In propositional logic, affirming the consequent (also known as converse error, fallacy of the converse, or confusion of necessity and sufficiency) is a formal fallacy (or an invalid form of argument) that is committed when, in the context of an indicative conditional statement, it is stated that because the consequent is true, therefore the ...
The Conway base 13 function is a function created by British mathematician John H. Conway as a counterexample to the converse of the intermediate value theorem.In other words, it is a function that satisfies a particular intermediate-value property — on any interval (,), the function takes every value between () and () — but is not continuous.
In logic a counterexample disproves the generalization, and does so rigorously in the fields of mathematics and philosophy. [1] For example, the fact that "student John Smith is not lazy" is a counterexample to the generalization "students are lazy", and both a counterexample to, and disproof of, the universal quantification "all students are ...
The converse is "If a polygon has four sides, then it is a quadrilateral. " Again, in this case, unlike the last example, the converse of the statement is true. The negation is " There is at least one quadrilateral that does not have four sides.
The converse does hold e.g. if the domain is simply connected; this is Cauchy's integral theorem, stating that the line integral of a holomorphic function along a closed curve is zero. The standard counterexample is the function f(z) = 1/z, which is holomorphic on C − {0}.
For example, the four-vertex theorem was proved in 1912, but its converse was proved only in 1997. [3] In practice, when determining the converse of a mathematical theorem, aspects of the antecedent may be taken as establishing context. That is, the converse of "Given P, if Q then R" will be "Given P, if R then Q".
The converse is always true. Every Hilbert space has this property. There are, however, Banach spaces which do not; Per Enflo published the first counterexample in a 1973 article. However, much work in this area was done by Grothendieck (1955). Later many other counterexamples were found.
Using composition of relations, the converse may be composed with the original relation. For example, the subset relation composed with its converse is always the universal relation: ∀A ∀B ∅ ⊂ A ∩B ⇔ A ⊃ ∅ ⊂ B ⇔ A ⊃ ⊂ B. Similarly, For U = universe, A ∪ B ⊂ U ⇔ A ⊂ U ⊃ B ⇔ A ⊂ ⊃ B.