Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
If selected, the publisher contributes substantially towards editing (including developmental editing if necessary), designing, and marketing the book. The author pays for none of this and expects to get paid (assuming the book sells). If the publisher rejects the book, then the author is free to sell it to a different publisher.
Some publishers (less than 5% and decreasing as of 2014) may charge a fee for an additional service [15] such as a free license on the publisher-authored copyrightable portions of the printed version of an article. [16] If the author posts the near-final version of their work after peer review by a journal, the archived version is called a ...
Who is the publisher? Is the work self-published? Does the publisher have a history of editorial reputation? Does the publisher have any biases? When was the source published? Is the information outdated? Does the source cite its own sources? Is it based on facts or opinions? Is the source primary, secondary, or tertiary?
In open access publishing, a journal article is made available free for all on the web by the publisher at the time of publication. Both open and closed journals are sometimes funded by the author paying an article processing charge, thereby shifting some fees from the
When an author self-publishes a book, they retain all rights and assume responsibility for all stages of preparing, publishing and distributing the book. The author may hire professionals on a fee-for-service basis as needed, (e.g. an editor, cover designer, proofreader) or engage a company to provide an integrated package. [36]
However, if an author is an established expert with a previous record of third-party publications on a topic, their self-published work may be considered reliable for that particular topic. Whether a source is usable also depends on context. Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material.
Book publisher Simon & Schuster's sale to investment firm KKR is novel in many ways, but also part of a long-term trend. History tells us to expect the unexpected.
It's a pretty simple model - you provide a group of qualified and prolific Wikipedia editors free access to your resources, and they use that access to write content on Wikipedia, adding citations back to the source. You can choose to provide a set number of accounts (say, 100) which we distribute through an application-and-approval process, or ...