Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In anthropology, high-context and low-context cultures are ends of a continuum of how explicit the messages exchanged in a culture are and how important the context is in communication. The distinction between cultures with high and low contexts is intended to draw attention to variations in both spoken and non-spoken forms of communication. [ 1 ]
High concept is a type of artistic work that can be easily pitched with a succinctly stated premise. [1] It can be contrasted with low concept , which is more concerned with character development and other subtleties that are not as easily summarized.
High- and low-context cultures: context is the most important cultural dimension and also difficult to define. The idea of context in culture was advanced by the anthropologist Edward T Hall. He divides culture into two main groups: High and Low context cultures. He refers to context as the stimuli, environment or ambiance surrounding the ...
High context culture – a culture with the tendency use high context messages, resulting in catering towards in-groups; Low context culture – culture with a tendency not to cater towards in-groups; Non-institutional culture - culture that is emerging bottom-up from self-organizing grassroot initiatives, rather than top-down from the state
Sociolinguistics is the descriptive study of the interaction between society, including cultural norms, expectations, and context and language and the ways it is used. It can overlap with the sociology of language, which focuses on the effect of language on society.
Very high pitch is for strong emotion or emphasis. [21] Pitch can indicate attitude: for example, Great uttered in isolation can indicate weak emotion (with pitch starting medium and dropping to low), enthusiasm (with pitch starting very high and ending low), or sarcasm (with pitch starting and remaining low).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=High_and_low_context_culture&oldid=795222867"
Research has identified a correlation between linear-active cultures (i.e. following a daily schedule with a single task at a time) [4] with high-trust societies, and multi-active cultures (flexible schedules with many tasks at once, often in an unplanned order) with low-trust cultures.