When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Term_Limits,_Inc._v...

    XVII. U.S. Const. amend. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that states cannot impose qualifications for prospective members of the U.S. Congress stricter than those the Constitution specifies. The decision invalidated 23 states ' Congressional term limit ...

  3. Term limits in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term_limits_in_the_United...

    It was an open question whether states had the constitutional authority to enact these limits. In May 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5–4 in U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995), that states cannot impose term limits upon their federal representatives or senators.

  4. It’s undemocratic that we still don’t have term limits for ...

    www.aol.com/news/undemocratic-still-don-t-term...

    A 2020 survey found that 77% of people favor term limits for Supreme Court justices. And a recent poll found that 89% of Democrats and 56% of Republicans support a cap on the number of years a ...

  5. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  6. Judicial review in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_the...

    Judicial review is now well established as a cornerstone of constitutional law. As of September 2017, the United States Supreme Court had held unconstitutional portions or the entirety of some 182 Acts of the U.S. Congress, the most recently in the Supreme Court's June 2017 Matal v. Tam and 2019 Iancu v.

  7. Column: Why we need term limits for Supreme Court justices

    www.aol.com/news/column-why-term-limit-supreme...

    The most common version of this proposal is for a term limit of 18 years, combined with a permanent fixing of the court's size at nine. The goal would be to provide an opening on the bench every ...

  8. Clinton v. City of New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_v._City_of_New_York

    Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that the line-item veto, as granted in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution because it impermissibly gave the President of the United States the power to unilaterally amend or repeal ...

  9. U.S. Term Limits - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Term_Limits

    Among other activities, USTL supports statewide ballot initiatives to impose term limits. In the early 1990s, USTL organized grassroots campaigns that placed term limits on the congressional delegations of 23 states. These were overturned as unconstitutional in 1995 by the Supreme Court, in a 5–4 decision in U.S. Term Limits v.