Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In constitutional and administrative law, reasonableness is a lens through which courts examine the constitutionality or lawfulness of legislation and regulation. [12] [13] [14] According to Paul Craig, it is "concerned with review of the weight and balance accorded by the primary decision-maker to factors that have been or can be deemed relevant in pursuit of a prima facie allowable purpose".
Despite this possible difference, both women may still be reasonable and well-intentioned. There is nothing inherent in the difference of opinion that means one or the other must be unreasonable and of ill intent. No matter how disparate the opinions may be, reasonable people with good intentions can still disagree over matters of substance.
There are two types of reasonable expectations of privacy: Subjective expectation of privacy: a certain individual's opinion that a certain location or situation is private which varies greatly from person to person; Objective expectation of privacy: legitimate and generally recognized by society and perhaps protected by law.
Opinion: A perfectly reasonable, highly unrealistic path to peace. Opinion by Frida Ghitis. December 1, 2023 at 6:42 AM. ... She is a weekly opinion contributor to CNN, a contributing columnist to ...
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard should apply to a civilian's claim that law enforcement officials used excessive force in the course of making an arrest, investigatory stop, or other "seizure" of his or her person.
Legal opinion is a key point in law. In law, a legal opinion is in certain jurisdictions a written explanation by a judge or group of judges that accompanies an order or ruling in a case, laying out the rationale and legal principles for the ruling.
James D. Zirin, opinion contributor January 17, 2025 at 11:30 AM I spent much of the past two years following and applauding the efforts of special counsel Jack Smith to bring Donald Trump to book.
In law, a reasonable person, reasonable man, sometimes referred to situationally, [1] is a hypothetical person whose character and care conduct, under any common set of facts, is decided through reasoning of good practice or policy. [2] [3] It is a legal fiction [4] crafted by the courts and communicated through case law and jury instructions. [5]