When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: why are literature reviews useful
    • Shop Kindle E-Readers

      Take your stories wherever you go

      on our family of Kindle e-readers

    • Amazon Deals

      Shop our Deal of the Day, Lightning

      Deals & more limited-time offers.

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Literature review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature_review

    A literature review can be a type of review article. In this sense, a literature review is a scholarly paper that presents the current knowledge including substantive findings as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. Literature reviews are secondary sources and do

  3. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    After a manuscript is published, the process of peer review continues as publications are read, known as post-publication peer review. Readers will often send letters to the editor of a journal, or correspond with the editor via an on-line journal club. In this way, all "peers" may offer review and critique of published literature.

  4. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  5. Review article - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_article

    Review articles come in the form of literature reviews and, more specifically, systematic reviews; both are a form of secondary literature. [21] Literature reviews provide a summary of what the authors believe are the best and most relevant prior publications. Systematic reviews determine an objective list of criteria, and find all previously ...

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (medicine)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    Reviews may be narrative or systematic (and sometimes both). Narrative reviews provide a general summary of a topic based on a survey of the literature, which can be useful when outlining a topic. A general narrative review of a subject by an expert in the field can make a good secondary source covering various aspects of a subject within a ...

  7. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    These include literature reviews, systematic review articles, topical monographs, specialist textbooks, handbooks, and white papers by major scientific associations. News reports are also secondary sources, but should be used with caution as they are seldom written by persons with disciplinary expertise.

  8. Scientific literature - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_literature

    A review is a detailed analysis of recent developments on a topic. A commentary is a short summary of an author's personal experience. Editorials are short reviews or critiques of original articles. Letters to the editor are communications directed to the editor of an article to ask questions and provide constructive criticism.

  9. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...