Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
On June 30, 2021, the NCAA ruled that its student-athletes could start earning money for the use of their name, image and likeness, opening the door for players to be paid through sponsorship ...
It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to ...
A common refrain exists in most discussions regarding the potential right for NCAA college athletes to be paid for their services: the argument that college are already paid by virtue of their receipt of in-kind benefits including room and board, daily meals, and a full athletic scholarship. According to these commentators, college athletes do ...
The legal landscape seems increasingly receptive to the idea that college athletes should be compensated for the profits they produce for schools. March Madness brings in millions for colleges ...
Former NFL player Reggie Bush is suing USC, the Pac-12 Conference and the NCAA in an effort to get compensation for their use of his name and likeness when he was a star running back at the school.
Heisman Trophy winner Reggie Bush sues USC, the Pac-12 and the NCAA over name, image and likeness compensation he alleges he lost while in college and after he left.
The probability of college athletes becoming employees has gripped much of college athletics in fear. Some lawmakers plan to address the concept in a congressional bill.
The Fair Pay to Play Act, originally known as California Senate Bill 206, [2] is a California statute that will allow collegiate athletes to acquire endorsements and sponsorships while still maintaining athletic eligibility. [3] The bill would affect college athletes in California's public universities and colleges.