Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The SPDX License List contains extra MIT license variations. Examples include: [1] MIT-advertising, a variation with an additional advertising clause. There is also the Anti-Capitalist Software License (ACSL), [22] built off of the MIT license. The ACSL is not OSI-approved, nor does it qualify as a free software license as defined by the FSF ...
This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it – be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license – , how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software ...
Pages in category "Software using the MIT license" The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 437 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .
Diagram of software under various licenses according to the FSF and their The Free Software Definition: on the left side "free software", on the right side "proprietary software". On both sides, and therefore mostly orthogonal, "free download" . A software license is a legal instrument governing the use or redistribution of software.
[111] [112] Proprietary software has heavily integrated open-source code released under the Apache, BSD, and MIT licenses. [113] Open core is a business model where developers release a core piece of software as open source and monetize a product containing it as proprietary software. [ 114 ]
The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."
License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.
For example, (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) means that one can choose between Apache-2.0 (Apache License) or MIT (MIT license). On the other hand, (Apache-2.0 AND MIT) means that both licenses apply. There is also a "+" operator which, when applied to a license, means that future versions of the license apply as well.