Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In principle, double coincidence of wants would mean that both parties must agree to sell and buy each commodity. Under this system, problems arise through the improbability of the wants, needs, or events that cause or motivate a transaction occurring at the same time and the same place.
The Collingridge dilemma is a methodological quandary in which efforts to influence or control the further development of technology face a double-bind problem: . An information problem: impacts cannot be easily predicted until the technology is extensively developed and widely used.
Where there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms… The writer Edward S. Herman cited what he saw as examples of doublespeak and doublethink in modern society. [9] Herman describes in his book, Beyond Hypocrisy, the principal characteristics of doublespeak:
When the model becomes accurate, it is just as difficult to understand as the real-world processes it represents. Buttered cat paradox: Humorous example of a paradox from contradicting proverbs. Intentionally blank page: Many documents contain pages on which the text "This page intentionally left blank" is printed, thereby making the page not ...
Double-spending is the unauthorized production and spending of money, either digital or conventional. It represents a monetary design problem: a good money is verifiably scarce, and where a unit of value can be spent more than once, the monetary property of scarcity is challenged.
A double bind is a dilemma in communication in which an individual (or group) receives two or more mutually conflicting messages. In some scenarios (e.g. within families or romantic relationships) this can be emotionally distressing, creating a situation in which a successful response to one message results in a failed response to the other (and vice versa), such that the person responding ...
A double standard is the application of different sets of principles for situations that are, in principle, the same. [1] It is often used to describe treatment whereby one group is given more latitude than another. [ 2 ]
For example, if the Earth clocks age 1 day less on each leg, the amount that the Earth clocks will lag behind amounts to 2 days. The physical description of what happens at turnaround has to produce a contrary effect of double that amount: 4 days' advancing of the Earth clocks.