Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
One reason lurkers lurk is the need to learn more about the group. In interviews, lurkers claim a lack of understanding of the community as a reason for not posting. [19] Lurkers often take the time before posting to evaluate the group for how well it is a fit for them. [12]
Pie chart showing the proportion of lurkers, contributors and creators under the 90–9–1 principle. In Internet culture, the 1% rule is a general rule of thumb pertaining to participation in an Internet community, stating that only 1% of the users of a website actively create new content, while the other 99% of the participants only lurk.
There are two major types of participation in online communities: public participation and non-public participation, also called lurking. Lurkers are participants who join a virtual community but do not contribute. In contrast, public participants, or posters, are those who join virtual communities and openly express their beliefs and opinions.
Wikipedia has many lurkers. If you see an account that seems to know Wikipedia policy and formatting well for a new user, don't assume it's a sockpuppet – the user may well be a lurker, or a friend could have taught them about Wikipedia. Some users may well be friends/acquaintances of another editor, and not sockpuppets. They may also have a ...
Additionally, discussions indicate that both lurkers and posters had distinct motives for lurking and might modify their engagement behaviours based on how they understand the community from various online groups, despite the fact that engagement between those who post and those who lurk was different in the communities studied. [19]
The Lurkers, 1970s English punk rock group; Lurk (Dungeons & Dragons) Lurk, another name for a vampire in the Buffy the Vampire Slayer spin-off comic Fray; Lurk, a character in the 1972 British comedy film Up the Front; Lurk, another name for a myrddraal, a fictional shadowspawn species in the Wheel of Time series; Lurk, 2009 Chinese TV series
The Anatomy of Power is a book written by Harvard economist John Kenneth Galbraith, originally published in 1983 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [3] It sought to classify three types of power: compensatory power in which submission is bought, condign power in which submission is won by making the alternative sufficiently painful, and conditioned power in which submission is gained by persuasion. [4]
Three bases of legitimate power are cultural values, acceptance of social structure, and designation. [1] Cultural values comprise a general basis for legitimate power of one entity over another. [1] Such legitimacy is conferred by others and this legitimacy can be revoked by the original granters, their designees, or their inheritors. [8]