Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
As they say, you: Can extract publication title, main online URL, number of citations, number of online versions, link to Google Scholar's main cluster for the work, and Google Scholar's cluster of all works referencing the publication.
You can do it with scholar package. Follow the steps. 1) Find the article in scholar.google.de 2) Click on one the authors registered in google scholar, this will show the page with all articles of that author 3) Click on the title of the article you want, this will show the profile for the article.
Using google scholar might be another option for you. Since many researcher also have a google scholar profile, you can explore preliminary collaboration patterns and the number of citations. Maybe this helps you a bit to trace back some recent developments and to identify the main scholars in the field.
The link will be found by google's crawlers (during their regular site checking crawlers), and then - hopefully - google's algorithms will add the link to the pdf on google scholar. – Mark Commented Sep 21, 2017 at 20:17
Such 'stray' citations can be corrected, see Anne-Wil Harzing's guide to correcting stray citations in Google Scholar. Note that the same problem occurs in all citation databases to some extent. Most of them have some mechanism for reporting and correcting (besides Google Scholar, at least Web of Science and Scopus do).
Google Scholar may mark citation counts with an asterisk (*), meaning: This "Cited by" count includes citations to the following articles in Scholar. The ones marked * may be different from the article in the profile. How can I validate citations in my Google Scholar account that are genuine but are marked with a *?
First of all, make sure that the place where Google Scholar is getting the data from has it listed correctly. They scrape from other sources and there's a mistake in the source, then there will be a mistake in Google Scholar as well. Then you should try to contact them and let them know of the mistake. Even though the chance to get it corrected ...
12. [Citation] means that Google Scholar has not been able to find a source for the publication, but that it has inferred that it exists because other publications cite it. Taken directly from Google Scholar help "These are articles which other scholarly articles have referred to, but which we haven't found online.
In Google Scholar, I can view the number of citations of each article, but this includes self-citations. Is there a way to view the number of non-self citations? In this tweet from 2019 , the author suggests a way to calculate this number for a specific article.
Improve this question. Very recently, I had noticed that almost all scholars, from all countries and from all different universities, that I am aware of, their Google scholar citations counting suddenly drop (of the scale of 10, to 100 to 1000 to 10^4 counting, depending on your academic ranks and total citations).