When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Spevack v. Klein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spevack_v._Klein

    Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967) was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the court held in a plurality decision that the Self-incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment applied even to attorneys in a state bar association under investigation, and an attorney asserting that right may not be disbarred for invoking it.

  3. Mitchell v. United States (1999) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_v._United_States...

    Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999), is a United States Supreme Court case that considered two Fifth Amendment privileges related to a criminal defendant’s rights against self-incrimination in a Federal District Court.

  4. Salinas v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas

    Salinas v. Texas, 570 US 178 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which the court held 5-4 decision, declaring that the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause does not extend to defendants who simply choose to remain silent during questioning, even though no arrest has been made nor the Miranda rights read to a defendant.

  5. United States v. Hubbell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Hubbell

    (1) The Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination protects a witness from being compelled to disclose the existence of incriminating documents that the Government is unable to describe with reasonable particularity; and (2) Where the witness produces such documents pursuant to a grant of immunity, 18 U. S. C. §6002 ...

  6. Kastigar v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kastigar_v._United_States

    Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled on the issue of whether the government's grant of immunity from prosecution can compel a witness to testify over an assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

  7. Twining v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twining_v._New_Jersey

    Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908), was a case of the U.S. Supreme Court.In this case, the Court established the Incorporation Doctrine by concluding that while certain rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights might apply to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, the Fifth Amendment's right against self-incrimination is not incorporated.

  8. J. D. B. v. North Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._B._v._North_Carolina

    A Miranda warning is an explanation of a suspect's rights that must be given by law enforcement before interrogation. It stems from the 1966 Miranda v. Arizona case, and is based primarily on the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

  9. South Dakota v. Neville - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Neville

    South Dakota v. Neville, 459 U.S. 553 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that prosecutors may use a suspect's refusal to submit to a blood-alcohol test as evidence of guilt and that the introduction of such evidence at trial does not violate the suspect's Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination.