Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell v Hodges enshrined the right of same-sex couples to marry (Getty Images) ... was overturned 50 years later,” she said. “The federal government ...
The resolution comes after Associate Justice Clarence Thomas’s expressed interest in revisiting the Obergefell decision in his concurring opinion on the Supreme Court's landmark 2022 opinion on ...
Joe and Frank Capley-Alfano of California rally before the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on April 28, 2015, the day the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. Hodges.
[2] [3] Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by statute, court ruling, or voter initiative in 36 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam. [3] Between January 2012 and February 2014, plaintiffs in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee filed federal district court cases that culminated in Obergefell v.
Jackson Women's Health Organization in June 2022 overturned Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In his concurrence, Justice Clarence Thomas postulated that the court should revisit other past cases which granted rights based on substantive due process, including the right of same-sex marriages from Obergefell, leading to concerns from ...
A district court judge ruled in the case of In re Marriage of Hogsett and Neale that the couple had not formed a common-law marriage, the Lucero text factors were outdated and granted Neale's motion to dismiss. The Colorado Court of Appeals agreed in December 2018 with the lower court's finding, and noted that pursuant to Obergefell v.
But even if Obergefell were overturned, the bipartisan-backed Respect for Marriage Act requires the federal government to respect valid marriage licenses of same-sex couples. Voiding marriage ...
The judge ruled that the plaintiff could not show he had been harmed by the Obergefell ruling. [30] The decision was upheld by the Tennessee Court of Appeals in May 2018. [31] The court's opinion stated, "None of the citizen plaintiffs alleged that they were denied a marriage license; instead, they complain of the issuance of marriage license ...