Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An unfunded mandate is a statute or regulation that requires any entity to perform certain actions, with no money provided for fulfilling the requirements. This can be imposed on state or local government, as well as private individuals or organizations.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995; Long title: An Act to curb the practice of imposing unfunded Federal mandates on States and local governments; to strengthen the partnership between the Federal Government and State, local and tribal governments; to end the imposition, in the absence of full consideration by Congress, of Federal mandates on State, local, and tribal governments without ...
This executive order called for a decrease in unfunded mandates and the development of a process for all elected officials, including tribal officials, to provide input on federal policies. [5] On April 29, 1994 President Clinton invited leaders from all 547 recognized tribes to a tribal summit on issues facing tribal communities, the first ...
To curb the practice of imposing unfunded Federal mandates on States and local governments; to strengthen the partnership between the Federal Government and State, local and tribal governments; to end the imposition, in the absence of full consideration by Congress, of Federal mandates on State, local, and tribal governments without adequate ...
August 18–28 – 1994 Commonwealth Games in Victoria, British Columbia October – A lockout closes the National Hockey League for the entire first half of the season. November 19 – The Western Ontario Mustangs win their sixth Vanier Cup by defeating the Saskatchewan Huskies 50–40 in the 30th Vanier Cup played at Skydome in Toronto
According to National Safety and Securities Services "Anti-bullying legislation, typically an unfunded mandate requiring schools to have anti-bullying policies but providing no financial resources to improve school climate and security, offer more political hype than substance for helping school administrators address the problem." [15]
February 24, 1994 Shell Canada Products Ltd v Vancouver (City of), [1994] 1 SCR 231 : April 27, 1993 February 24, 1994 United States of America v Lépine, [1994] 1 SCR 286 : June 18, 1993 February 24, 1994 RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (AG), [1994] 1 SCR 311 : October 4, 1993 March 3, 1994 Case name Argued Decided Lamer La Forest
Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on publication bans and their relation to the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.