Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Here, sizeof buffer is equivalent to 10 * sizeof buffer [0], which evaluates to 10, because the size of the type char is defined as 1. C99 adds support for flexible array members to structures. This form of array declaration is allowed as the last element in structures only, and differs from normal arrays in that no length is specified to the ...
For example, a two-dimensional array A with three rows and four columns might provide access to the element at the 2nd row and 4th column by the expression A[1][3] in the case of a zero-based indexing system. Thus two indices are used for a two-dimensional array, three for a three-dimensional array, and n for an n-dimensional array.
The sizeof operator on such a struct gives the size of the structure as if the flexible array member were empty. This may include padding added to accommodate the flexible member; the compiler is also free to re-use such padding as part of the array itself.
In addition to support for vectorized arithmetic and relational operations, these languages also vectorize common mathematical functions such as sine. For example, if x is an array, then y = sin (x) will result in an array y whose elements are sine of the corresponding elements of the array x. Vectorized index operations are also supported.
This representation for multi-dimensional arrays is quite prevalent in C and C++ software. However, C and C++ will use a linear indexing formula for multi-dimensional arrays that are declared with compile time constant size, e.g. by int A[10][20] or int A[m][n] , instead of the traditional int **A .
char * pc [10]; // array of 10 elements of 'pointer to char' char (* pa)[10]; // pointer to a 10-element array of char The element pc requires ten blocks of memory of the size of pointer to char (usually 40 or 80 bytes on common platforms), but element pa is only one pointer (size 4 or 8 bytes), and the data it refers to is an array of ten ...
[3] Even though the row is indicated by the first index and the column by the second index, no grouping order between the dimensions is implied by this. The choice of how to group and order the indices, either by row-major or column-major methods, is thus a matter of convention. The same terminology can be applied to even higher dimensional arrays.
A = round (rand (3, 4, 5) * 10) % 3x4x5 three-dimensional or cubic array > A (:,:, 3) % 3x4 two-dimensional array along first and second dimensions ans = 8 3 5 7 8 9 1 4 4 4 2 5 > A (:, 2: 3, 3) % 3x2 two-dimensional array along first and second dimensions ans = 3 5 9 1 4 2 > A (2: end,:, 3) % 2x4 two-dimensional array using the 'end' keyword ...