When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox

    A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one's expectation. [1] [2] It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true or apparently true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.

  3. List of paradoxes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_paradoxes

    However, some of these paradoxes qualify to fit into the mainstream viewpoint of a paradox, which is a self-contradictory result gained even while properly applying accepted ways of reasoning. These paradoxes, often called antinomy , point out genuine problems in our understanding of the ideas of truth and description .

  4. Simpson's paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson's_paradox

    One of the best-known examples of Simpson's paradox comes from a study of gender bias among graduate school admissions to University of California, Berkeley.The admission figures for the fall of 1973 showed that men applying were more likely than women to be admitted, and the difference was so large that it was unlikely to be due to chance.

  5. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    An example is a probabilistically valid ... "while citation data create new tools for analyses of research ... Paradox – Logically self-contradictory statement;

  6. Principle of explosion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

    In classical logic, intuitionistic logic, and similar logical systems, the principle of explosion [a] [b] is the law according to which any statement can be proven from a contradiction. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] That is, from a contradiction, any proposition (including its negation ) can be inferred; this is known as deductive explosion .

  7. Contradiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

    This contradiction, as opposed to metaphysical thinking, is not an objectively impossible thing, because these contradicting forces exist in objective reality, not cancelling each other out, but actually defining each other's existence. According to Marxist theory, such a contradiction can be found, for example, in the fact that:

  8. Reductio ad absurdum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum

    Reductio ad absurdum, painting by John Pettie exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1884. In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for "argument to absurdity") or apagogical arguments, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.

  9. Paradox (literature) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_(literature)

    In literature, the paradox is an anomalous juxtaposition of incongruous ideas for the sake of striking exposition or unexpected insight. It functions as a method of literary composition and analysis that involves examining apparently contradictory statements and drawing conclusions either to reconcile them or to explain their presence.