Ad
related to: pal vs ntsc video
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
PAL and NTSC have slightly divergent colour spaces, but the colour decoder differences here are ignored. Outside of film and TV broadcasts, the differences between PAL and NTSC when used in the context of video games were quite dramatic. For comparison, the NTSC standard is 60 fields/30 frames per second while PAL is 50 fields/25 frames per second.
The NTSC 4.43 system, while not a broadcast format, appears most often as a playback function of PAL cassette format VCRs, beginning with the Sony 3/4" U-Matic format and then following onto Betamax and VHS format machines, commonly advertised as "NTSC playback on PAL TV". Multi-standard video monitors were already in use in Europe to ...
Perhaps the most technically challenging conversion to make is the PAL and SÉCAM to NTSC conversion. PAL and SÉCAM use 625 lines at 50 fields/s or 25 frames/s; NTSC uses 525 lines at 59.94 fields/s (60000/1001) or 30 frames/s; The NTSC standard is temporally and spatially incompatible with both PAL and SÉCAM.
NTSC discs may be output from a PAL DVD player in three different ways: using a non-chroma encoded format such as RGB SCART or YP B P R component video. using PAL 60 encoded composite video/S-Video—a "hybrid" system which uses NTSC's 525/60 line format along with PAL's chroma subcarrier; using NTSC encoded composite video/S-Video.
When transferred to NTSC television, the rate is effectively slowed to 23.976 FPS (24×1000÷1001 to be exact), and when transferred to PAL or SECAM it is sped up to 25 FPS. 35 mm movie cameras use a standard exposure rate of 24 FPS, though many cameras offer rates of 23.976 FPS for NTSC television and 25 FPS for PAL/SECAM.
Analog television systems were standardized by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) in 1961, [1] with each system designated by a letter (A-N) in combination with the color standard used (NTSC, PAL or SECAM) - for example PAL-B, NTSC-M, etc.). These analog systems for TV broadcasting dominated until the 2000s.
This preserves the pitch and sample rate of the audio, and the higher resolution of PAL video compared to NTSC, at the expense of more stuttery motion. [8] [9] Yet another method is frame blending, which preserves smooth motion but leaves ghosting artifacts. This method has been criticized by some as looking amateurish. [10] [11]
Most Digital8 units offer an LP mode, which increases the recording time on an NTSC P6-120 tape to 90 minutes. For PAL, the Digital8 recorder runs 1½ times faster; thus, a 90-minute PAL Hi8 tape yields 60 minutes of Digital8 video. PAL LP mode returns the tape speed to the Hi8 SP speed, so a Hi8 90-minute tape yields 90 minutes of Digital8 video.
Ad
related to: pal vs ntsc video