Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the ... "An auxiliary hypothesis ought to be testable independently of ...
The Duhem–Quine thesis argues that no scientific hypothesis is by itself capable of making predictions. [3] Instead, deriving predictions from the hypothesis typically requires background assumptions that several other hypotheses are correct — that an experiment works as predicted, or that previous scientific theory is accurate.
A theory is a hypothesis that has survived many tests and seems to be consistent with other established scientific theories. Since a theory is a promoted hypothesis, it is of the same 'logical' species and shares the same logical limitations. Just as a hypothesis cannot be proven but can be disproved, that same is true for a theory.
However, it may be preferable to avoid them when talking about scientific topics, to avoid misunderstandings. Some examples: General explanations in topics other than science (economic theory, political theory) A guess, educated or not, and may not be an actual hypothesis as defined earlier ("My theory is that the main character will die in the ...
The hypothesis of Andreas Cellarius, showing the planetary motions in eccentric and epicyclical orbits. A hypothesis (pl.: hypotheses) is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. A scientific hypothesis must be based on observations and make a testable and reproducible prediction about reality, in a process beginning with an educated guess or ...
Download as PDF; Printable version ... Scientific theories are distinguished from philosophical theories in that each of their theorems are statements about ...
The history of scientific method considers changes in the methodology of scientific inquiry, not the history of science itself. The development of rules for scientific reasoning has not been straightforward; scientific method has been the subject of intense and recurring debate throughout the history of science, and eminent natural philosophers and scientists have argued for the primacy of ...
The Kuhn-Popper debate was a debate surrounding research methods and the advancement of scientific knowledge. In 1965, at the University of London's International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper engaged in a debate that circled around three main areas of disagreement. [1]