Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In asymptotic analysis in general, one sequence () that converges to a limit is said to asymptotically converge to with a faster order of convergence than another sequence () that converges to in a shared metric space with distance metric | |, such as the real numbers or complex numbers with the ordinary absolute difference metrics, if
Since the secant method can carry out twice as many steps in the same time as Steffensen's method, [b] in practical use the secant method actually converges faster than Steffensen's method, when both algorithms succeed: The secant method achieves a factor of about (1.6) 2 ≈ 2.6 times as many digits for every two steps (two function ...
In numerical analysis, Aitken's delta-squared process or Aitken extrapolation is a series acceleration method used for accelerating the rate of convergence of a sequence. It is named after Alexander Aitken, who introduced this method in 1926. [1] It is most useful for accelerating the convergence of a sequence that is converging linearly.
In numerical analysis, the secant method is a root-finding algorithm that uses a succession of roots of secant lines to better approximate a root of a function f. The secant method can be thought of as a finite-difference approximation of Newton's method , so it is considered a quasi-Newton method .
Two classical techniques for series acceleration are Euler's transformation of series [1] and Kummer's transformation of series. [2] A variety of much more rapidly convergent and special-case tools have been developed in the 20th century, including Richardson extrapolation, introduced by Lewis Fry Richardson in the early 20th century but also known and used by Katahiro Takebe in 1722; the ...
Is there a fixed order of convergence for repeated roots with the secant method? For instance, with the Newton-Raphson method, R=2 (quadratic) for simple roots and R=1 for repeated roots. For the Secant Method, R=1.618.... for simple roots, but what about repeated/complex roots? Computer Guru 21:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
This yields 1.15448, which is not in the interval between (3a 3 + b 3) / 4 and b 3). Hence, it is replaced by the midpoint m = −2.71449. We have f(m) = 3.93934, so we set a 4 = a 3 and b 4 = −2.71449. In the fifth iteration, inverse quadratic interpolation yields −3.45500, which lies in the required interval.
Halley's method is a numerical algorithm for solving the nonlinear equation f(x) = 0.In this case, the function f has to be a function of one real variable. The method consists of a sequence of iterations: