When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. What is the best book to learn probability?

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/31838

    2. "Lectures on probability theory and mathematical statistics" by M. Taboga. While pretty elementary, it provides proofs of all the main results in probability theory, something you would not find in most other elementary textbooks. It also has plenty of solved exercises and examples.

  3. What distinguishes measure theory and probability theory?

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/118221

    1. Measure theory allows unbounded measures. There exists a uniform measure on the integers, for example, but there is no uniform probability. – Thomas Andrews. Mar 9, 2012 at 14:06. 2. There is a discussion of what distinguishes probability theory from measure theory in section 10.2 of Loève's book Probability Theory I. – t.b.

  4. A path to truly understanding probability and statistics

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/436415

    Probability (which one(s)?): An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 1 and Vol. 2 by Feller (for intuitive understanding) Introduction to Probability Theory by Hoel, Port, Stone; A Probability Path by Resnick (for measure theoretic / modern approach?) Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability by Mosteller

  5. 2. I highly recommend A User's Guide to Measure Theoretic Probability by David Pollard (2002). Here are some reasons why you should consider it over the other recommendations: Unlike Probability and Stochastics by Çinlar, Pollard's book is much more conversational and motivates the need for definitions, rather than presenting them out of thin ...

  6. probability - Good books on "advanced" probabilities -...

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/156165

    24. I think Chung's A Course in Probability Theory is a good one that is rigorous. Also Sid Resnick's A Probability Path is advanced but easy to read. +1 for Resnick, probably the most readable of the graduate level probability textbooks without losing an ounce of rigor.

  7. 7. It depends which kind of probability theory you're interested in. An introductory course on probability theory can either dwell on discrete probability or continuous probability. Discrete probability, which deals with discrete events (e.g. the probability that if you throw a dice it comes up 6 6 ten times in a row), only really needs ...

  8. What is $\\omega$ in probability theory? - Mathematics Stack...

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/666164/what-is-omega-in-probability-theory

    Then $\langle\Omega,\mathcal A,\Bbb P\rangle$ is readily a probability space that models the situation precisely. Now, one event that may transpire is that heads was flipped at least once. There are three possible outcomes such that this occurs--all but $\langle T,T\rangle$--so the event in question is $$\bigl\{\langle H,H\rangle,\langle H,T ...

  9. Jeff Rosenthal's book A First Look at Rigorous Probability. It is 200 pages long. It is very clearly explained (baby Rudin is all you need). It develops all the measure theory you need in a probability context. It has a lot of easy exercises that build confidence that you understand basic concepts.

  10. Newest 'probability-theory' Questions - Mathematics Stack...

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/probability-theory

    Law of large numbers for higher moment condition. Let {Xn}n ≥ 1 be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with mean 0, unit variance, and finite absolute third moment. Define Sn = X1 + ⋯ + Xn. Then we know following hold: (1) for $0<p&... probability-theory. probability-distributions. probability-limit-theorems. Scion.

  11. Rigorous graduate probability textbook for self-study.

    math.stackexchange.com/questions/3955639/rigorous-graduate-probability...

    In my first-year Ph.D. course for probability theory, we used Durrett's Probability Theory and Examples, but I found that the book is too terse for a first reading. I had no problem reading Terrace Tao's Introduction to Measure Theory and Folland's Real Analysis in my real analysis course, but the proofs in Durrett's book were often incomplete ...