Ad
related to: heliyon journal author guidelines pdf
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Heliyon is a monthly peer-reviewed open-access mega journal covering research in science, medicine and engineering. Unlike most of its competitors, the journal will consider for publication works reporting negative/null results, incremental advances, and replication studies, [1] thus filling the market niche, which became vacant after the discontinuation of the Journal of Negative Results in ...
As of 2018, articles rejected by the journal can be considered for Elsevier's open access, Author Pays megajournal, Heliyon. [3] The Heliyon author fee in 2018 was $1,250 and $1,500 in 2019. [ 4 ]
the authors disclose the existence of the preprint at submission (e.g. in the cover letter) once an article is published, the preprint should link to the published version (typically via DOI ) the preprint should not have been formally peer reviewed
Most publishers permit self-archiving of the postprint version of the author's own chapter (if contributed to only one chapter) or 10% of the total book (if contributed to multiple chapters). [3] The notable exception is Elsevier, which is the largest publisher to not permit chapter archiving under any circumstances.
It has been suggested that the academic journal landscape might become dominated by a few mega journals in the future, at least in terms of total number of articles published. [8] Mega journals shift the publishing industry's funding standard from the subscription-based model common to traditional closed access publications to article ...
Money.ca shares what to know in order to be compensated for the three most encountered air travel headaches.
Seed oils — plant-based cooking oils often used in processed, packaged foods — have been linked to an increased risk of colon cancer, according to a new study published in the medical journal Gut.
Scopus is a scientific abstract and citation database, launched by the academic publisher Elsevier as a competitor to older Web of Science in 2004. [1] An ensuing competition between the two databases has been characterized as "intense" and is considered to significantly benefit their users in terms of continuous improvent in coverage, search/analysis capabilities, but not in price.