Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014), is a landmark decision [1] [2] in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing privately held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation that its owners religiously object to, if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom ...
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014) and Zubik v. Burwell (2016) decisions that exempted privately held for-profit corporations and religious institutions from the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act. Several states, including California and Pennsylvania, challenged these new HHS rules as a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA
Pages in category "Affordable Care Act lawsuits" ... Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. C. California v. Texas; K. King v. Burwell
PLANTATION, FL - JUNE 30: A Hobby Lobby store is seen on June 30, 2014 in Plantation, Florida. Today in Washington, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a suit brought by the owners of Hobby Lobby ...
An Olathe building — formerly Hobby Lobby and Goodwill — has sat empty for four years.. But the 110,000-square-foot space, at 16630 W. 135th St. near North Mur-Len Road, may soon see visitors ...
The last major contraception case to go before the Supreme Court was 2014’s Burwell v.Hobby Lobby Stores, in which the Christian owners of the craft empire Hobby Lobby sued the Obama ...
One of the ancient clay tablets shows Cuneiform script which Hobby Lobby bought. The Hobby Lobby smuggling scandal started in 2009 when representatives of the Hobby Lobby chain of craft stores received a large number of clay bullae and tablets originating in the ancient Near East. The artifacts were intended for the Museum of the Bible, funded ...
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Court ruled that the birth control mandate in employee-funded health plans when the company is "closely-held" violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. The case set a precedent for allowing corporations and individuals to make religious claims for exemption from laws and regulations based on a ...