Ad
related to: hidden traps in decision-making hbr
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Cognitive bias mitigation is the prevention and reduction of the negative effects of cognitive biases – unconscious, automatic influences on human judgment and decision making that reliably produce reasoning errors. Coherent, comprehensive theories of cognitive bias mitigation are lacking.
The tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcome instead of the quality of the decision at the time it was made. Pessimism bias: The tendency for some people, especially those with depression, to overestimate the likelihood of negative things happening to them. (compare optimism bias) Present bias
A continually evolving list of cognitive biases has been identified over the last six decades of research on human judgment and decision-making in cognitive science, social psychology, and behavioral economics. The study of cognitive biases has practical implications for areas including clinical judgment, entrepreneurship, finance, and management.
Getty By Shana Lebowitz There are plenty of external factors that can hold you back from success at work — from a dismal economy to backstabbing coworkers. But when it comes to professional ...
Disagree and commit is a management principle that individuals are allowed to disagree while a decision is being made, but that once a decision has been made, everybody must commit to implementing the decision. Disagree and commit is a method of avoiding the consensus trap, in which the lack of consensus leads to inaction. [1] [2]
Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions is a 2008 book by Dan Ariely, in which he challenges readers' assumptions about making decisions based on rational thought. Ariely explains, "My goal, by the end of this book, is to help you fundamentally rethink what makes you and the people around you tick.
[31] The writing process was coordinated by decision making scientist Linnea Gandhi, who also did much of the editing. [30] Gandhi also co-wrote the Harvard Business Review article [7] that introduced the concept of noise in human judgment in 2016. In the Acknowledgements section of the book, the authors thank many fellow social scientists for ...
The fifth component refers to the defeat of the group leader to poor decision making in order to avoid making similar decisions in the future. There are several factors that may indicate the presence of the Abilene Paradox in the decision-making process: [4] Leaders who publicly do not fear the unknown. Such arrogance leads them to go along as ...