When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: another word for unverified research paper sample

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) 2020: 2020 The Center for Economic and Policy Research is an economic policy think tank. Though its articles are regularly written by subject-matter experts in economics and are frequently cited by reliable sources, most editors consider the CEPR biased or opinionated, so its uses should be attributed.

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    For example, a paper reviewing existing research, a review article, monograph, or textbook is often better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised. Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves (see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of ...

  4. Wikipedia : Verifiability/Removal of Unsourced Material

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability/...

    Sometimes the entire article is supported by a list of sources in a section at the bottom of the article (this approach was common in the past). This makes it harder to verify specific statements and to rule out possibilities of original research, but the article cannot be presumed to be unreferenced in such circumstances. If a book is listed ...

  5. Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use

    However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be considered unacceptable because Wikipedia is not a reliable source. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Many [ 4 ] colleges and universities, as well as public and private secondary schools, have policies that prohibit students from using Wikipedia as their source for doing research papers, essays, or ...

  6. Wikipedia:Attribution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Attribution

    Original research is material that cannot be attributed to a reliable source. It is unattributable . The only way to demonstrate that material is not original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic of the article, and to adhere to what those sources say.

  7. Plagiarism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism

    The term, a reference to Roget's Thesaurus, coined by Chris Sadler, principal lecturer in business information systems at Middlesex University, who uncovered the practice in papers submitted by his students, [32] [34] [35] though there is no scholarly evidence of Rogeting more broadly, as little specific research has been conducted.

  8. Misinformation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation

    Misinformation can also often be observed as news events are unfolding and questionable or unverified information fills information gaps. Even if later retracted, false information can continue to influence actions and memory. [26] Rumors are unverified information not attributed to any particular source and may be either true or false. [27]

  9. Fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact-checking

    [10] [11] A 2018 paper found little overlap in the statements checked by different fact-checking organizations. [12] This paper compared 1,178 published fact-checks from PolitiFact with 325 fact-checks from The Washington Post ' s Fact Checker, and found only 77 statements (about 5%) that both organizations checked. [ 12 ]