When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: beretta gun case over under shotguns reviews and complaints california

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Beretta 682 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta_682

    The Beretta 682 (also known as the S682, 682 Gold, and 682 Gold E) [2] is a competition grade [further explanation needed] over-under shotgun. It is manufactured, marketed, and distributed by Fabbrica d'Armi Pietro Beretta, in Gardone Val Trompia, Italy. The 682 comes in various grades for sporting clays, trap and skeet shooting.

  3. Roberti–Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberti–Roos_Assault...

    The Roberti–Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 (AWCA) is a California law that bans the ownership and transfer of over 50 specific brands and models of firearms, which were classified as assault weapons. Most were rifles, but some were pistols and shotguns. The law was amended in 1999 to classify assault weapons by features of the firearm.

  4. Miller v. Bonta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._Bonta

    Miller v. Bonta is a pending court case before Judge Roger Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California concerning California's assault weapon ban, the Roberti–Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 (AWCA).

  5. Beretta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beretta

    Beretta is known for its broad range of firearms: side-by-side shotguns, over-and-under shotguns, semi-automatic shotguns, hunting rifles, express rifles, assault rifles, submachine guns, lever- and bolt-action rifles, single- and double-action revolvers and semi-automatic pistols. [21]

  6. Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Lawful...

    Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Other short titles: Child Safety Lock Act of 2005: Long title: An Act to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others.

  7. Peruta v. San Diego County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peruta_v._San_Diego_County

    Peruta v. San Diego, 824 F.3d 919 (9th Cir. 2016), was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy regarding requiring documentation of "good cause" that "distinguish[es] the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way" (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 26150, 26155) before issuing a ...