Ad
related to: john 3:16 commentary
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Speculations that John 3:16 is the personal commentary of an evangelist (traditionally named John the Evangelist) have arisen, [61] but it remains controversial. [62] Pawson said it is unusual for Jesus to speak from the third-person perspective, [63] or to repeat or expand on what he had said.
John 3 is the third chapter of the ... Biblical references for verses John 3:7 and John 3:16 are both used in signage and ... New Bible Commentary: 21st ...
23 of these do not appear in 1 John or the Gospel of John, of which four are unique to 3 John, one is common to 2 and 3 John, and two are found in both 2 and 3 John as well as in other New Testament writings. Approximately 30% of the significant words in 3 John do not appear in 1 John or the Gospel, compared to 20% for 2 John. [30]
John 3:12 πιστευετε (ye believe) – 𝔓 75 050 083 579 it aur,ff 2,l vg mss co bo mss πιστευσετε (ye will believe) – rell. John 3:16. υιον – 𝔓 66 𝔓 75 א* B W supp υιον αυτου – rell. John 3:20 τα εργα αυτου – א B Δ 050 063 083 086 28 700 1230 1242 c 1253 1365 2148 Byz ℓ mss it cop ...
This results in a controversial speculation[38] that John 3:16 is a personal commentary of an evangelist, traditionally John the Evangelist. There is speculation that John 3:16 is the personal commentary of an evangelist, traditionally "thought to be" John the Evangelist, but it is controversial. Done.
The Gospel of John, like all the gospels, is anonymous. [14] John 21:22 [15] references a disciple whom Jesus loved and John 21:24–25 [16] says: "This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and has written them, and we know that his testimony is true". [11]
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The Second Epistle of John thus forms the link which unites the Johannine epistles, by being closely connected to both the First and the Third. [21] The Third Epistle of John seems to be independent of the First Epistle of John in its language. [21] If one only considers these two letters, there's no reason to ascribe them the same author.