Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Since its appearance, pull-based development has gained popularity within the open software development community. On GitHub, over 400,000 pull-requests emerged per month on average in 2015. [1] It is also the model shared on most collaborative coding platforms, like Bitbucket, Gitorious, etc. More and more functionalities are added to ...
Adempiere, a community maintained fork of Compiere 2.5.3b, due to disagreement with commercial and technical direction of Compiere Inc. Cdrkit, from Cdrtools due to perceived licensing issues. [4] [5] [6] LedgerSMB, from SQL-Ledger, due to disagreements over handling of security issues. MindTouch, a fork of MediaWiki.
Sites such as GitHub, Bitbucket and Launchpad provide free DVCS hosting expressly supporting independent branches, such that the technical, social and financial barriers to forking a source code repository are massively reduced, and GitHub uses "fork" as its term for this method of contribution to a project.
Take these table saws where the work is: outside, in the basement, to the job site, or in the garage. Skip to main content. Sign in. Mail. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 ...
The Libav project was a fork of the FFmpeg project. [6] It was announced on March 13, 2011 by a group of FFmpeg developers. [7] [8] [9] The event was related to an issue in project management and different goals: FFmpeg supporters wanted to keep development velocity in favour of more features, while Libav supporters and developers wanted to improve the state of the code and take the time to ...
Gitea is an open-source Git service created by Lunny Xiao, who was also a founder of its predecessor, the self-hosted Git service Gogs. Xiao invited a group of users and contributors from the Gogs community to join in the development of Gitea.
List of formerly open-source software Title Orig. free date License change date Initial free license Non-free license Forked replacement Notes Akka: 2009 2022
xHarbour is a fork [6] of the earlier Harbour project. xHarbour takes a more aggressive approach to implementing new features in the language, while Harbour is more conservative in its approach, aiming first of all for an exact replication of Clipper behaviour and then implementing new features and extensions as a secondary consideration.