When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Presumption of sanity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_sanity

    The presumption of sanity is a legal presumption. Its effect is that a person who faces criminal trial is presumed sane until the opposite is proved. Similarly, a person is presumed to have testamentary capacity until there is evidence to undermine that presumption.

  3. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    Sanity is a rebuttable presumption and the burden of proof is on the party denying it; the standard of proof is on a balance of probabilities, that is to say that mental incapacity is more likely than not. If this burden is successfully discharged, the party relying upon it is entitled to succeed.

  4. Presumption - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption

    In law, a presumption is an "inference of a particular fact". [1] There are two types of presumptions: rebuttable presumptions and irrebuttable (or conclusive) presumptions. [2]: 25 A rebuttable presumption will either shift the burden of production (requiring the disadvantaged party to produce some evidence to the contrary) or the burden of proof (requiring the disadvantaged party to show the ...

  5. R. v. Chaulk - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._v._Chaulk

    Lamer CJC explained that there is a presumption of criminal capacity. For a minor child, the reverse is true. For a child over age 14, the presumption of incapacity is rebuttable. A claim of insanity undermines the voluntariness of either the actus reus or the mens rea. It can also provide an excuse to criminal conduct, where intention is present.

  6. What to know about an Oklahoma senator's efforts to 'restore ...

    www.aol.com/news/know-oklahoma-senators-efforts...

    What to know about an Oklahoma senator's efforts to 'restore moral sanity' in his state. Saleen Martin, USA TODAY. January 27, 2025 at 1:51 PM.

  7. Coffin v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffin_v._United_States

    It is the duty of the judge, in all jurisdictions, when requested, and in some when not requested, to explain the presumption of innocence to the jury in his charge. The usual formula in which this doctrine is expressed is that every man is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Court membership; Chief Justice

  8. Right to silence in England and Wales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence_in...

    Opponents claimed that innocent people may reasonably remain silent for many reasons, and that changing the law would introduce an element of compulsion and was in clear conflict with the existing core concepts of the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof. [citation needed]

  9. Sanity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanity

    Sanity (from Latin: sānitās) refers to the soundness, rationality, and health of the human mind, as opposed to insanity.A person is sane if they are rational.In modern society, the term has become exclusively synonymous with compos mentis (Latin: compos, having mastery of, and Latin: mentis, mind), in contrast with non compos mentis, or insanity, meaning troubled conscience.