Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The rule was created in 1927 and refined in 1992. Since its most recent refinement in 2002, the rule states: [1] When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.
Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised describes the following types of meetings: Regular meeting – a meeting normally scheduled by the organization at set intervals. [9] [10] For example, it could be a weekly or monthly meeting of the organization. Special meeting – a meeting scheduled separately from a regular meeting, as the need arises ...
In online groups, a quorum has to be determined in a different manner since no one is actually "present". The rules establishing such groups would have to prescribe this determination. [7] An example is that a quorum in such groups could be established as "present" if enough members state that they are "present" at the designated meeting time. [8]
Parliamentary procedures are the accepted rules, ethics, and customs governing meetings of an assembly or organization. Their object is to allow orderly deliberation upon questions of interest to the organization and thus to arrive at the sense or the will of the majority of the assembly upon these questions. [1]
There are different types of meetings though, and each have different rules. A work session is typically where the public body will get together to discuss one or just a few small items specifically.
The House Rules provide that the chairman of a committee presides over its meetings, maintains decorum and ensures that the committee adheres to the House Rules governing committees and generally acts in an administrative role respective to such issues as determining salaries of committee staff, issuing congressional subpoenas for testimony and ...
Generally, a point of order must be raised at the time the rules are broken or else it would be too late. [3] For example, if a motion was made and discussion began on it, it would be too late to raise a point of order that the motion was not seconded. If such a motion was adopted without a second, it remains valid and not having a second ...
Henry M. Robert. A U.S. Army officer, Henry Martyn Robert (1837–1923), saw a need for a standard of parliamentary procedure while living in San Francisco.He found San Francisco in the mid-to-late 19th century to be a chaotic place where meetings of any kind tended to be tumultuous, with little consistency of procedure and with people of many nationalities and traditions thrown together.