Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Lexical ambiguity is a subtype of semantic ambiguity where a word or morpheme is ambiguous. When a lexical ambiguity results from a single word having two senses, it is called polysemy . For instance, the English "foot" is polysemous since in general it refers to the base of an object, but can refer more specifically to the foot of a person or ...
Lexical ambiguity is contrasted with semantic ambiguity.The former represents a choice between a finite number of known and meaningful context-dependent interpretations.. The latter represents a choice between any number of possible interpretations, none of which may have a standard agreed-upon meani
Ambiguity; Semantic ambiguity; Analogical models; Analogy; Semantic analysis (computational) Anankastic conditional; Anaphora (linguistics) Antecedent (grammar) Antecedent-contained deletion; Applied semantics; Aptronym; Associative meaning; Autological word; Automatic acquisition of sense-tagged corpora; Autonomy of syntax
The ambiguity ends at was enlightening, which determines that the second alternative is correct. When readers process a local ambiguity, they settle on one of the possible interpretations immediately without waiting to hear or read more words that might help decide which interpretation is correct (the behaviour is called incremental processing ...
This page was last edited on 31 December 2018, at 20:11 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
In addition, the sentence contains semantic ambiguity. For instance, the noun phrase "Time flies" could refer to all time flies or particular time flies, and "an arrow" to all arrows, a particular arrow, or different arrows for different flies; compare "Fruit flies like a banana", "Fruit flies ate a banana", "Fruit flies live on a banana".
Syntactic ambiguity, also known as structural ambiguity, [1] amphiboly, or amphibology, is characterized by the potential for a sentence to yield multiple interpretations due to its ambiguous syntax. This form of ambiguity is not derived from the varied meanings of individual words but rather from the relationships among words and clauses ...
In 1973, Richard Montague argued that a grammar for a small fragment of English contains the logicosyntactic and semantic devices to handle practically any scope phenomenon. [5] The tool that he mainly relied on is a categorial grammar with functional application; in terms of recent formulations, it can be considered Minimalist syntax with ...